Labouring the Walmart Way Essay

1 Always low costs. Continuously. This is the motto of the world’s biggest organization, a U.S.- based retailer whose huge box stores offer a one-stop shop, from goods to pieces of clothing to cultivate hoses. The mystery of Walmart’s achievement is to give purchasers the most reduced costs 14 percent lower than its rivals (Greenhouse, 2003)- by expanding the effectiveness of the gracefully chain, the profitability of the work power, and the utilization of work sparing innovation. Contenders must receive a comparative strategy, offer something Walmart doesn't, or leave business-as Woolco, Eaton’s, Simp children, and Woodwards have in Canada (Moore and Pareek, 2004). The impact of the Walmart model isn't probably going to melt away sooner rather than later. With more than 235 stores in Canada and plans for fast extension, Walmart and its impacts on work merit considering. Are its extends of employment opportunities, its demeanor toward unionization, and its effect on industry work rehearses worth the low cost on the rack? 2 One of the most continuous grievances about Walmart, which utilizes 1.4 million individuals around the world, is its inability to pay laborers a living pay. Store representatives are paid 20-30 percent not exactly the business normal, making a considerable lot of them qualified for social help. It is evaluated that American citizens fork out $2.5 billion every year in government assistance installments to Walmart workers (Head, 2004). Since the retailer recruits hard-to-put laborers, similar to late migrants, seniors, and single parents, its representatives are frequently apprehensive they won't look for some kind of employment somewhere else. The sort of work Walmart offers is difficult: stores are purposefully understaffed-the technique behind the company’s incredible profitability gains-with the goal that current representatives will work more diligently (Head, 2004). It is claimed that fundamental victimization ladies inside the enterprise has prevented the lion's share from securing Walmart laborers the possibility at advancement, a charge that is currently the subject of the biggest social liberties suit in U.S. history.

The best blogs every HR professional needs to ready

The best web journals each HR proficient requirements to prepared Things are changing constantly in the HR world, so if you’re searching for approaches to keep flow, you can’t turn out badly with online journals. However, which one? We have you secured, regardless of what road you need to investigate. Here are probably the best, industry-driving websites that can help keep you in the loop.The HR CapitalistWritten by Kris Dunn, a long-term HR official with an enthusiasm for productivity, The HR Capitalist spotlights on approaches to make your work progressively smoothed out and educated. Features incorporate regular tips, interviews with fundamental aces, book audits, and mindful expositions on current patterns. Reward blog: Dunn additionally runs Fistful of Talent, which highlights assorted voices expounding on patterns and news from enlisting and ability management.PandologicBy placing the range of HR subjects in a single spot (like enrolling, enrollment promoting, system, information and investigation, publicizing, and tech patterns ), Pandologic gives you a checkpoint for all that’s new and creating in your expert world. With its attention on quick moving patterns and future turn of events, this blog is designed for the expert hoping to gain or keep up forward ground in their organization.Ask a ManagerWho doesn’t love a solid counsel section? Ask a Manager brings Dear Abby into the HR domain, offering shrewd guidance on genuine issues looked by experts in the field. The guidance here originates from Alison Green, a long-lasting administration and HR proficient. Green’s theory depends on reasonableness and efficiency, utilizing correspondence to take care of issues before they become difficult or, more regrettable, profession blockers.The Buzz on HRIn The Buzz on HR, HR administrator Sarah Morgan (who has over 20 years of involvement with the channels) carries her remarkable experiences to initiative and authoritative administration. In the event that you’re searching for an every da y hit of short pattern pieces and breaking news, this may not be the spot; however in the event that you need astute, insightful papers on the encounters and difficulties confronting the bustling HR proficient, this one is an extraordinary blog to add to your rotation.hbspt.cta.load(2785852, '9e52c197-5b5b-45e6-af34-d56403f973c5', {});HR BartenderWhen party time feels excessively far away (when it’s, state, at 10 a.m. on a Tuesday), you can even now get the experience of talking with an amicable voice who comprehends that HR is a way of life (not only a normal everyday employment) at HR Bartender. HR proficient turned-specialist Sharlyn Lauby gets that the HR world isn’t just enrollment and information it’s a basic piece of an authentic working environment, with human interests and concerns. HR Bartender utilizes a light, commonsense way to deal with the issues confronting HR pros.HR ExaminerIf you’re searching for understanding into the innovation thatâ €™s forming the HR world increasingly more consistently, at that point HR Examiner can help you nerd out to your heart’s content. It’s about the crossing point of innovation, examination, and hands-on HR work. The blog remembers for profundity examination of patterns and items, just as week after week meetings, bulletins, and web recordings to keep you expert on all the most recent tech trends.The Undercover RecruiterUndercover Recruiter is somewhat not quite the same as the remainder of the pack since it brings HR-themed content for a few unique crowds: the business, the scout, and the activity searcher. The blog includes a different cluster of authors and themes, covering industry patterns, tips for methodology and best practices, and news on the most recent patterns that influence employing from all angles.WorkologyWorkology is incredible in light of the fact that it handles points implied for HR masters at each level: novice, midlevel, the executives, official, and so on. With in excess of 100 scholars giving news and understanding into patterns and the HR experience, the blog bolsters the HR lifer at each phase of their profession. The stage likewise has broad internet based life and digital broadcast content, just as a week by week bulletin to keep you up on all the news you have to know.The best HR web journals are ones that advise, yet additionally show how dynamic and assorted the HR people group is. Each of these is an extraordinary asset that can assist you with developing and flourish in your association and discover your clan while you get the hang of all that you have to know.

Spyware on Children’s Computers; Regorian Rhetoric

Guardians as Undercover Cops Spyware is any innovation that guides in social event data about an individual or association without their insight. On the web, spyware is customizing that is placed in someone’s PC to subtly accumulate data about the client and hand-off it to publicists or other invested individuals. For this situation, the ‘other intrigued parties’ are guardians. Guardians are turning out to be increasingly more defensive of their children. Many are presently getting open to putting spyware on their children’s PCs when already that was unthought-of.No matter what ones specific attitude toward this subject is, there are advantages and disadvantages of each side, and most appear to lean generally on one side or the other, instead of being more in the center. There are numerous destructive snares on the web, yet does that legitimize following children’s each keystroke on their PC? Harlan Coben accepts spyware is more than advocated. In Co ben’s article, â€Å"The Undercover Parent,† Coben states that guardians are overprotective of their children in numerous different angles, for example, knowing their passwords to their telephones, administering them at all occasions, thus on.So why give them their autonomy with regards to the web? I comprehend what he implies and even concur with his thinking here and there. Coben says that the ones doing the reconnaissance are not some administration authorities; they are cherishing guardians attempting to secure their posterity. This contention is legitimate in light of the fact that it shows that the guardians who decide to place the product in PCs are extremely simply attempting to remember their children wellbeing, and the individuals who contrast it with being studied by an administration organization or something of the like is ludicrous.Some kids are in danger of being hurt through the web, and do necessitate that reconnaissance. The youngsters that are accide ntally speaking with a pedophile, or the â€Å"43% of teenagers [that] have been survivors of digital harassing in the last year,† could have had a chance of being helped if their folks had spyware programming downloaded onto their PC. (Stop Cyber Bullying Before it Start’s) obviously, ‘what-if’s’ are continually going to be asked, and it is highly unlikely that spyware can tackle these issues completely. Pedophilia and digital tormenting are both major issues and should be stopped.Yes, spyware could support the issue. Indeed, spyware could alarm or advise a parent on the off chance that one of these two exercises is going on, which could be amazingly helpful. I concur that spyware ought to be utilized in these unmistakable circumstances. Coben likewise accepts that having this program fortifies to kids the way that the web isn't a safe house of protection. In a scholastic diary article in regards to Facebook, a site that numerous youngsters and ado lescents are utilizing, it is composed that â€Å"We need to instruct them that NOTHING IS PRIVATE on the web, particularly their social networks† (Fodeman).All kids need to comprehend and recognize that the web isn't private, however much more so the individuals who utilize person to person communication, in light of the fact that once something is composed and sent, transferred, or anything, it can never be reclaimed or erased. Sure you can expel certain things, however some place it is still out there, and it tends to be recovered whenever esteemed fundamental. Everybody approaches posts on the web, and if the explanation they are not abusing the web is a result of their dread of the spyware, at that point so be it.There is an almost negligible difference between being capably defensive and untrustworthily intrusive, Coben contends. On the off chance that a parent will have spyware on their children’s PC, they should do as such for the right reasons. Doing so in lig ht of the fact that there is a destructive conduct being locked in without another approach to stop it is adequate enough of thinking. Be that as it may, attempting to be filled in on the most recent tattle and happenings in the child’s life won't cut it. Guardians should be capable and paying special mind to unsafe and negative behaviors.They ought not be manhandling their forces or the apparatuses given to them to help guarantee their adored child’s online security and insurance. I do will in general concur with the different contentions that Coben uses to approve his cases, yet I have two distinct feelings on the utilization of spyware technololgy. In the event that ones youngster is unscrupulous, taking part in dubious or unsafe conduct, introduce the spyware. In the event that a parent has genuine proof that their youngster is hurting oneself, at that point the parent has an obligation to help and secure the kid despite the fact that their kid may not need the vig ilant eye.It is more than reasonable for guardians whose kids have occupied with a perilous conduct, to let them know â€Å"If you don’t meet your duties to deal with yourself and to remain protected, at that point I’m going to make whatever strides essential. On the off chance that that implies glancing in your room, glancing in your drawers and looking on your PC, that’s precisely what I’m arranged to do† (Lehman). That way the kid will know there is a chance of a spyware being put on their PC and are not found napping if something from the spywares report were to be raised in the future.The wellbeing of one’s kids ought to be number one on the guardians rundown and they should have the option to do what is regarded vital so as to ensure. Understanding messages, having the information on what they scan for on the web, and seeing the entirety of their correspondences might be essential for specific circumstances. The circumstances where spy ware ought to be put on children’s PCs are just in extraordinary instances of untruthfulness, implicating conduct, or dubious exercises. Spyware may not be the best method to ensure kids, yet in such cases the spyware could help the situation.Besides outrageous cases, eventually guardians having spyware on their children’s electronic gadgets without their insight are more destructive than useful. A review led of college understudies in the United States demonstrated that â€Å"64% showed they unequivocally couldn't help contradicting the explanation that ‘spyware is more valuable than hurtful. ’†(Freeman) The primary explanation putting spyware on a child’s PC that has done nothing incorrectly is destructive, is on the grounds that the connection among parent and kid will no doubt be affected adversely when the youngster makes sense of there is spyware on their computer.If guardians have kids that meet their check in time, deal with their obl igations, and so forth, there is no motivation to sneak around on them. Great conduct ought to be compensated, and telling your youngster that the absence of impedance in her own space is an immediate consequence of her great conduct strengthens the trust given to that kid. Spyware doesn't assistant in making freedom or individuation. An objective of child rearing ought to be to raise a youthful grown-up who can settle on autonomous choices and who can have their very own existence. Youngsters are continually attempting to be people and need more independence.Part of having their very own existence is having their very own space. At the point when guardians spy on their mindful youngster, the message they are sending is that despite the fact that the kid has not done anything incorrectly, the kid despite everything should be watched and isn't reliable. Likewise, youngsters and adolescents for the most part discover a dreadful parcel more about PCs and innovation than grown-ups do. I n light of the distinction in ages, most youngsters and kids realize how to check for spyware, how to incapacitate it, and how to get around it, as a general rule without the parent recognizing what has happened.It is incomprehensible for a parent to keep tabs and know totally everything their kid does, which they ought not, and now and then it is better along these lines. Regardless of whether a kid doesn't discover a path around the spyware, are guardians truly arranged to know their kid's mysteries that are not hurtful to themselves, for example, sexual action, in spite of the fact that can be unsafe now and again, or sexual direction? Here and there it is ideal to be uninformed. Guardians ought not go searching for things that in the event that they knew would cause issues in the family tearing them apart.What is the most terrible that youngsters can get into on the web? Guardians need to comprehend that their children are human, and thus let them be human. They are going to nee d to attempt new things, and investigating the web is likely going to be a unique little something. What is so awful about that in any case? It won't degenerate them; nothing â€Å"corrupts† individuals except for others. It isn't the web doing the defiling, it is those behind what is being appeared and put out there, those that are composing in talk rooms and composing their blogs.It is anything but difficult to see kids as assets, similar to pets that must be spoiled and escaped the world, however they are individuals in any case, and they need to settle on their own choices regardless of whether they aren't â€Å"good† ones. A youngster merits their security the same amount of as anybody, including their folks. I accept that if guardians have encouraged their youngsters well, with ethics and the high points and low points of life and the web, they have to believe that their kid has been instructed all around ok to not abuse the web and the entirety of its capabiliti es.Joe Kelly, author of a national promotion bunch called Dads and Daughters, expresses that â€Å"Markets play on this dread something horrendous will happen to your kid, when the chances of that are minute. It may occur, however to have their entire youth predicated on this distant chance is, in the total, considerably additionally harming. â€Å"(Crary) Spyware truly sabotages the entirety of the trust that the parent and kid have with each other. In an overview of 1,006 AOL clients, â€Å"74. 2% said they saw spyware to be an individual danger. (Poston) Spyware is viewed as an individual danger to such a large number of residents as a result of its dispiriting and rude nature. I would not need it done to me, my folks would not need it done to th

PROTECTION OF PRIVACY IN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS essays

Security OF PRIVACY IN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS articles Security of protection is a significant issue and one that has regularly been energetically bantered in political, social and business hovers since protection is not, at this point a free item. Sometime in the past we could underestimate protection however with cutting edge innovation and better methods of correspondence taking over quickly, protection has become a far from being obviously true issue and the most genuine worry of business associations is by what means should protection be ensured without trading off the authoritative requirement for security. In his article Right to Privacy in the Workplace in the Information, Lloyd Rich (1995) keeps up that while the constitution doesn't expressly award rights to protection, Supreme Court has throughout the years pushed more protection and has upheld the person's entitlement to a private right under Fourth Amendment. The primary worry of workers today is insurance of their private correspondence led through and saved money on PCs. The email that a worker sends is intended for the beneficiary just and he world accordingly not welcome it being caught by the business. Anyway the manager feels that for the security of the whole association, it is his obligation to screen private correspondence. The quandary emerges: should we permit the businesses to attack our protection or ought to be summon our sacred rights to security and stop any infringement of the This article encourages us comprehend what precisely are our protection rights under the constitution so we can ensure them if a business tries to abuse them. Rich clarifies that Fourth Amendment doesn't offer total insurance of security in private representative boss cases. At the end of the day, he keeps up that Fourth Amendment applies where government is the essential entertainer. On the off chance that government is associated with unlawful hunts and seizures, we can summon protection rights under fourth Amendment, anyway the equivalent doesn't make a difference to common ... <!

Mexican View Point on the War with the United States Free Essays

A Mexican View Point on the War With the United States Introduction Jesus Velasco-Marquez composed â€Å"A Mexican View Point on the War With the United States† at some point around 1991. He wrote to share how the Mexicans felt about the U. S-Mexican War. We will compose a custom article test on Mexican View Point on the War with the United States or on the other hand any comparable subject just for you Request Now Mexico was just responding to the United States government taking what was legitimately theirs. Body The U. S-Mexican War has two altogether different stories relying upon whom you inquire. The war formally began when the leader of the United States at that point (James K. Polk) sent soldiers to the area between Rio Grande and Nueces River, Texans accepted that its fringe was the Rio Grande. Mexicans didn't recognize the Rio Grande as the outskirt; they trusted it was the Nueces River. The soldiers thought they were on Texan soil. Mexicans felt that the Americans had attacked their dirt. So Mexican soldiers assaulted The American soldiers, which brings forth the broadly imagined gossip of the Mexicans murdered Americans on American domain. Jesus thought it was essential to call attention to this was not so much evident on the grounds that the land was legitimately the Mexicans and they really accepted they were simply safeguarding their property. It was critical to him to tell how the Mexicans were not simply assaulting American officers without blinking. Despite the fact that there was a harmony settlement reviewed before the battling started Mexico didn't think of it as a lot of a trade off. They would lose the entirety of Texas, Oregon and California. From the Mexican view point it appeared as though that had no real option except to battle the issue out. In the event that they didn't defend themselves they would resemble a powerless nation. They couldn't help suspecting that the Americans were not treating them reasonably. In this way, they began making a move. Which finished in a full scale war. Marquez composed his article with numerous admirable statements concerning the war and the Mexican perspective. I accept that it was somewhat difficult to comprehend. Despite the fact that it had all the focuses efficient. One thing that Jesus thought was critical to gain from his article was Mexico was basically protecting its national security. Likewise he thought it was essential to tell the peruser that Mexico was not being pompous, simply reacting to the American governments activities. He needed others to realize that the Mexican government was to some degree flimsy at that point. On the off chance that any pioneer attempted to go to a concurrence with the Americans and another person didn’t like that choice that individual would be ousted. â€Å"Most individuals in Mexico accepted the utilization of arms was the main alternative accessible to shield their privileges and regional honesty. † I feel this is a significant statement from the content. It shows the perspective on most Mexicans at that point. They were not being flippant by battling yet simply going to bat for what they accepted was correct. In the American Pageant the Mexican-American War is referenced in section 17. One caption is Misunderstandings with Mexico; the war is depicted because of the president’s need for show fate. Another caption depicting the war is American Blood on American (? ) Soil, which portrays the disarray there was over the Rio Grande River and Nuece River being limits. /the page numbers are 368-373. End Before perusing Jesus Velasco-Marquez article I remained unaware of the Mexican-American War. In the wake of perusing the article I am significantly more educated about the war by and large. Likewise I know have a more prominent comprehension of the challengers the Mexicans looked during this war. The most effective method to refer to Mexican View Point on the War with the United States, Essays

Facts on the Sun Also Rises and Religion - Free Essay Example

Outline for Sun also rises oral The festival v The festival of san fermin was originally created as a religious festival but over time the circumstances have changed and it has become more about drinking and staying up all night. v Jake is much like the festival where he was once more Christian but over time his priorities have changed. Expatriots v Brett and jake are so far away from God and Christianity because their involvement in the war made it hard for them to view the world as a pure Christian place. Most expatriates were not religious at all and seriously lacked hope and faith v The lost generation really had no direction as to where to turn to when the war ended, unfortunately they turned more to sex and alcohol rather than religion because they felt it worked faster. v Both jake and brett are scarred from the war, both have lost the capability to love in a way, jake cannot physically be with a woman and brett lost the love of her life. Both are, in a way, bitter and take instead of turning to religion they turn away from it and drink v They have so much drama in their lives that they again turn away from religion to alcohol to escape reality Brett v Brett is emotionally wounded since her love died, she turned to sex and alcohol instead of religion to heal her much like other expatriots of her time v Brett knows that she is not worthy to call herself a good Christian that’s why in chapter 18 she says â€Å"I’m damned bad for a religious atmosphere. I’ve the wrong type of face. † v Brett doesn’t believe that prayer works as well at getting her what she wants as much as sex, alcohol and her good looks do that is why she says â€Å"Never does me any good. I’ve never gotten anything I prayed for†. v She is viewed as an impure person, and it is touched upon in chapter 15 when she is denied entrance into the cathedral. Even though she is only denied for not wearing a hat it is symbolism for her questionable morals. v She doesn’t really believe that God exists because everything in her life has not worked out perfectly much like everybody else’s v Brett does not call upon God because she is so used to every man giving her exactly what she wants and God simply does not succumb to her wishes v Brett uses her beauty as a crutch instead of god She is so beautiful that she gets everything that she wants which takes away from the essencial need for religion v The only good deed that brett has done in her life is giving up pedro romero so he can continue on with his life and not throw it all away for her v In the end of the book when she decided to free pedro romero she stated; â€Å"You know it makes one feel rather good deciding not to be a bitch. It’s sort of what we have instead God. He never worked very well with me. † v With this action she actually thought of another pers on besides herself

Misogyny in Hangover Square - Literature Essay Samples

Patrick Hamilton represents women in such a misogynistic manner in Hangover Square that we do not get insight on a single positive portrayal of a woman that George, the novels protagonist, meets on his journeys. Instead, we only hear a remotely positive attitude about a woman when we either hear about George’s Aunt at the beginning of the novel or about George’s sister, who has died; even then, neither of these two women are met directly by the reader. Mainly, the representation of women is portrayed through Netta. Through Hamilton’s use of free direct discourse, the reader may assume that the ideas in the narrative are unbiased and separate from George’s thoughts because the novel is not written in first person. We think that we are outside of his consciousness; however, the narrative shows us insights into George’s thoughts, which in turn provoke the reader to empathize with him and understand his opinions. Because of this design, the readerâ€⠄¢s opinions of Netta and the other women in the novel are crafted to encourage negative thoughts on women. The first woman we meet in the novel other than George’s Aunt is the woman on the train who joins George in his compartment. George has not even spoken to this woman before, nor has he ever seen her before, and we are instantly met with a ‘cold woman’ who ‘rudely and ruthlessly seized’ the handle of the door. This tells the reader that George’s attitude to women is not a positive one; this woman merely opened the door to a compartment to sit down, and George finds the maneuver insulting and intrusive. This woman, ‘apparently of the servant class’ (p.26), is portrayed as common and rambunctious, similar to the way in which the group of girls in Brighton are portrayed further into the novel. We learn that another woman standing on the platform wearing a hairnet had been ‘intentionally’ (p.27) trying to hurt George by making him think of Netta, as if women are constantly out to ‘torture’ (p.27) him and purely exist to cause him pain. Hamilton directly informs the reader of George’s feeling of deeply-felt pain and torture merely at the slight thought of Netta; this is the fault of two strangers who, in reality, did not do anything at all wrong. When we do meet Netta, as George arrives at Netta’s flat in Earl’s Court, we are also met with George’s fear of her. Netta’s ‘loveliness’ is described as a ‘weapon from the arsenal of her beauty.’ This statement shows how George sees their relationship as a war or a game, in which he is losing due to his weaknesses being among her ‘weapons.’ His love for her makes him weak, and the fact that this is revealed to the reader shows that he is aware of his love and weakness. This depiction of something essentially positive (her ‘loveliness’) being compared to a ‘weapon’ shows how Hamilton creates a misogynistic narrative in the respect that women are destructive and pernicious. Furthermore, the characters greeting is referred to as a ‘game of calling people by their surnames.’ This description gives a feeling of coldness, and the reference of their relationship being a game suggests t hat perhaps George is aware of the fact that is losing this game or war but does not take it so seriously; he is so infatuated with Netta that he makes the negative aspects of their contact seem less real by referring it something that is ‘just a game.’ Hamilton thus shows the reader that even though George loves Netta, there is also an underlying hatred which the reader too is mean to intuit. Further on in the novel, the narrative briefly switches from George’s insights to Johnnie’s, and we learn about his view on Netta and women in general; despite Netta being ‘decidedly attractive’ he does not actually like the look of her. She is described as ‘ill-natured’ and ‘ungracious’ and is then associated with women that used to come up to the office ‘in shoals’. This image gives women an animalistic characteristic (a shoal of fish), and with the connotation of fish suggests that they are perhaps simple creatures with little intellectual capacity and poor memories. Because Johnnie has an ‘extensive knowledge’ of different types of women and their ‘modes of behaviour,’ the reader would perhaps be more inclined to trust his opinion; it is weighted with more validity and justification. The women are also described as having their ‘nails dipped in blood and their faces smothered in pale cocoa’ (p.104). Their nails are painted red, but the use of the word ‘blood’ has connotations of danger, destruction and sinister. If Hamilton had simply used the word ‘red,’ it would have been more ambiguous; it could have meant danger but it could have also meant sex and lust. However, by using ‘blood, the author directly connotes specific ideas of danger, which foreshadow Netta’s death. Hamilton also describes the manner in which the womens foundation or ‘pale cocoa’ is deposited on their faces, and by describing it as ‘smothered’ suggests an unsightly application of such make up. The reference to ‘cocoa’ could perhaps be a reference to racial prejudice, which would suggest women’s inferiority, especially as the time when the novel was written was a time of considerable prejudice and segregation with regards to people who were not white and were thus considered inferior. On George’s trip to Brighton, he comes across a group of ‘violent girls’ who work in a cigarette factory in London. Instantly we are met with ‘girls’ as opposed to ‘women,’ a new clue which suggests the immaturity and inferiority of the girls. They are described as going about ‘in threes or fours’ as if they are a species of animal whose nature is being described. Their ways of ‘sprawlingâ €™ and ‘permeating’ suggest an untidy and inelegant manner, as they ‘affect the quality’ of the town. They are seen as lacking class, as ruining and spoiling a good town because they are loud and trashy, ‘bold’ and ‘violent. Moreover, we learn about Eddie Carstairs’ opinion on women when he, George, and Johnnie are having a conversation. He essentially says that their sole purpose is to please men; if a woman doesnt give a man what is desired, then a man should ‘throw her out the window.’ This opinion objectifies women and suggests that they are nothing but sexual objects to be used as men please. Eddie’s joke about throwing them out the window is ironic, since Netta hasn’t given George what he wants (which is actually her love); earlier on in the novel, when he considers different methods of killing her, he even thinks of pushing her out of the window. The fact that only Netta gets a voice in the novel is key; however, even then her voice is heard through George’s perceptions. The novel seems to portray women at large as an inferior class whose purpose is simply to please men, and after numerous references to women being prostitutes and animal-like, we discover that these women are nothing but irritating objects to Hamiltons men. After all, the only two women who are positively portrayed in the novel are George’s family members, whom he seemed to have a certain degree of respect for, but not a great deal of it (since they do not get as much of a voice as any male character in the novel). Even Peter, whom George he deeply dislikes, gets more of voice than any woman in the novel. Thus, Hamilton’s view on women seems to be extremely negative, and this negativity is prominently portrayed throughout Hangover Square.